TL;DR
Get sports gear delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham criticized officials over several Angel Reese incidents in Atlanta’s semifinal series against New York. On her podcast, Cunningham said Reese should have received a technical for confronting Sabrina Ionescu, while other contact she described as dangerous also went unpenalized. The WNBA has not been reported as responding to her comments.
Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham criticized the officiating in the WNBA playoffs, saying Angel Reese should have received a technical foul for pursuing and confronting Sabrina Ionescu during Atlanta’s semifinal series against the New York Liberty. Cunningham discussed the play and other incidents involving Reese on her No Hesitation podcast ahead of the Finals.
Cunningham was referring to a Game 3 sequence that followed a hard offensive foul by Ionescu on Atlanta guard Isobel Borlase. According to the report, Reese crossed the court and confronted Ionescu. Cunningham said she supported players standing up for teammates but believed the pursuit and face-to-face exchange crossed a line that should draw a technical foul.
“I appreciate her having her teammate’s back,” Cunningham said, while arguing that chasing an opponent down the court and getting in their ear should be penalized. She added that she would have accepted Reese yelling from her own side of the court. Cunningham called the absence of a technical in that instance “absolutely insane.”
Cunningham also cited two other plays from Atlanta’s deciding semifinal game. She said Reese made contact with Breanna Stewart after a foul had already been called on Rhyne Howard, leaving Stewart on the floor, and described a separate fourth-quarter play in which Reese appeared to dive toward a loose ball and contact Marine Fauthoux’s legs. The report says officials did not call a foul against Reese in either sequence.
Dispute Over Playoff Contact Calls
Cunningham’s remarks put a public spotlight on how officials distinguish physical defense and teammate support from conduct that merits a technical or personal foul. Her criticism concerns more than one exchange: she argues that separate contact involving Stewart and Fauthoux also went unpenalized, raising a question about consistency in the same series.
The debate matters as Atlanta moves into the Finals, where players and viewers will be watching how similar plays are called. Cunningham’s assessment is a player’s opinion, not an official league finding. The cited incidents and her interpretation do not by themselves establish that referees violated league rules.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Atlanta’s Route to the Finals
Atlanta advanced after beating New York 85-83 in Game 3 of the semifinal series, according to the source report. The disputed plays came amid a competitive matchup that included physical contact and verbal exchanges. Cunningham also objected to technical fouls issued to Reese and Liberty center Jonquel Jones after the two exchanged words, saying competitive trash talk should be allowed when players stay within the rules and avoid dangerous contact.
Cunningham contrasted the officials’ handling of those moments with a technical foul she received for pointing during Indiana’s 86-77 win over Phoenix on June 22. Indiana’s season ended with a 94-83 loss to Las Vegas. Atlanta, meanwhile, was preparing to face the Golden State Valkyries in Game 1 of the best-of-seven Finals at San Francisco’s Chase Center on Saturday.
“I appreciate her having her teammate’s back. I think that just shows that she care and that she has love for her teammates.”
— Sophie Cunningham, on her No Hesitation podcast
Officials’ Rulings and League Response
The report does not include an explanation from the game officials or the WNBA for the decisions on the cited plays. It also does not provide a league review, disciplinary action, or a formal finding that any of the contact was illegal. Cunningham’s descriptions and conclusions remain her own assessment; the precise rulings and any internal review are not stated.
The source gives limited play-by-play detail, so it is not possible from the report alone to independently determine the contact’s full sequence or how the officials interpreted it. No response from Reese, Ionescu, Stewart, Fauthoux, or the teams is included.
Finals Begin in San Francisco
Atlanta was scheduled to open the best-of-seven WNBA Finals against the Golden State Valkyries at Chase Center on Saturday. The source report does not say that the league plans to review Cunningham’s comments or revisit the semifinal calls. Attention now turns to the Finals and whether officiating decisions involving physical play become a subject of further comment.
Key Questions
What did Sophie Cunningham criticize?
She criticized the lack of a technical foul after Angel Reese pursued and confronted Sabrina Ionescu, and questioned officials’ handling of two other plays involving contact with Breanna Stewart and Marine Fauthoux.
What led to Reese’s confrontation with Ionescu?
The reported exchange followed a hard offensive foul by Ionescu on Atlanta guard Isobel Borlase. Cunningham said she understood Reese supporting a teammate but believed the confrontation warranted a technical.
Did officials penalize Reese in the other incidents Cunningham cited?
The source report says officials did not call a foul against Reese for the contact involving Stewart or for the play in which Reese appeared to dive toward the ball and contact Fauthoux’s legs.
Has the WNBA responded to Cunningham’s criticism?
No league response or formal review is included in the source report. Whether officials or the WNBA addressed the plays separately is not clear.
What happened after Atlanta’s semifinal win?
Atlanta defeated New York 85-83 in Game 3 to advance to the Finals, where it was scheduled to face the Golden State Valkyries in a best-of-seven series.
Source: google-trends
NFL season / tailgating Picks
team gear
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
