For riders comparing the best gravel race bikes, the SAVADECK Carbon with Shimano GRX400 is my strongest race-oriented pick: it pairs a named gravel groupset with hydraulic brakes and 40 mm tires. The SAVADECK SCRB0035 makes more sense for riders drawn to a carbon frame, hydraulic braking, and a 22-speed claim, though its drivetrain description is inconsistent. The Tommaso Sterrata is the aluminum alternative, with a carbon fork and Shimano components, but its listing leaves important component details unclear.
Get sports gear delivered free — and shop member deals
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
These three bikes all target paved roads and unpaved riding, yet they do not offer the same level of confidence for racing. I give the clearest, most specific drivetrain listing the highest place, then weigh the SCRB0035’s appealing equipment against its specification ambiguity. Tommaso earns a place as the simpler frame-material alternative, not as a confirmed race build. Fit, gearing, assembly, and reliable product details matter at least as much as a carbon label when choosing a bike for long, fast gravel events.
Complete the kit
Key Takeaways
- SAVADECK GRX400 is my lead choice because its 20-speed Shimano GRX400 drivetrain and RX400 hydraulic brakes are named clearly in the provided specifications.
- SAVADECK SCRB0035 pairs a T800 carbon frame and fork with hydraulic brakes and 700x40c tires, but its conflicting drivetrain speed claims need clarification before purchase.
- Tommaso Sterrata is the aluminum-frame option in this group, with a carbon fork and lifetime frame warranty; its component details are less specific than the SAVADECK listings.
- Both SAVADECK models list a weight of 10.4 kg and 40 mm tires, so fit and drivetrain certainty—not claimed weight—are stronger points of comparison here.
- Frame sizing deserves particular attention: the GRX400 listing specifies 51 cm, the SCRB0035 lists one recommended rider-height range, and the Tommaso description provides no sizing details.
| SAVADECK Carbon Gravel Bike with Shimano GRX400 |  | Best Overall for a Clearly Specified Gravel Drivetrain | Frame and fork: T800 R21 carbon fiber | Weight: 10.4 kg (22.92 lbs) | Drivetrain: Shimano GRX400, 20-speed | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| SAVADECK SCRB0035 Carbon Gravel Bike with Shimano 22-Speed Drivetrain |  | Best for Carbon Construction with Mostly Assembled Delivery | Frame material: T800 carbon fiber | Frame and fork weight: 10.4 kg (22.92 lbs) | Drivetrain: Shimano U6000 components; speed claims inconsistent | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Tommaso Sterrata Aluminum Gravel Bike with Carbon Fork and Shimano Drivetrain |  | Best Aluminum-Frame Alternative | Frame: Aluminum | Fork: Carbon | Drivetrain: Shimano components; exact specification unclear | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| gravel race bike | Drivetrain | Brakes | Tires | Frame size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAVADECK Carbon Gravel Bike wi | Shimano GRX400, 20-speed | Shimano RX400 hydraulic disc | 700 x 40c | 51 cm |
| SAVADECK SCRB0035 Carbon Grave | Shimano U6000 components; speed claims inconsistent | Hydraulic disc | 700x40c | — |
| Tommaso Sterrata Aluminum Grav | Shimano components; exact specification unclear | — | — | Not specified |
More Details on Our Top Picks
SAVADECK Carbon Gravel Bike with Shimano GRX400
I rank the SAVADECK Carbon with Shimano GRX400 first because it gives the most specific race-relevant component information in this group. Its listing names the GRX400 20-speed drivetrain, Shimano RX400 hydraulic disc brakes, and an RX600 crankset, rather than leaving the buyer to infer which Shimano parts are fitted. For a rider comparing bikes for a gravel event, that detail makes it easier to ask sensible questions about gearing and replacement components before committing.
The T800 carbon frame and fork, stated 10.4 kg weight, and 700 x 40c tires make this a clear mixed-surface proposition. The tires offer a broad stated width for road and unpaved use, while hydraulic brakes are a meaningful match for variable conditions and repeated braking. Those details do not establish race performance on their own, but they make the bike’s intended use easier to understand than the Tommaso’s sparse component description.
Compared with the SCRB0035, this model gives up the headline 22-speed claim but gains a more coherent component listing: GRX400 is named, the brake model is identified, and the crankset is specified. That distinction matters more to my ranking than a higher number of speeds when the competing listing itself reports inconsistent drivetrain claims. Both SAVADECK bikes list carbon construction, hydraulic disc brakes, 40 mm tires, and the same stated weight, so the GRX400’s advantage is specification confidence, not a verified speed or weight lead.
There are real limits. The listing gives only a 51 cm frame size, which narrows the likely fit options and makes it a poor choice for anyone outside a suitable fit range. The rigid setup also has no built-in shock absorption, and the aluminum wheels are not the same as a carbon wheel upgrade. Its 2-year limited warranty is less generous on paper than Tommaso’s lifetime frame warranty, though the warranty terms and coverage are not described in enough detail to compare them fully. I would select this SAVADECK when its frame size suits me and I want the clearest listed gravel groupset; I would skip it if fit is uncertain or I need a wider choice of sizes.
Pros:- T800 carbon frame and fork with a stated weight of 10.4 kg
- Named Shimano GRX400 20-speed drivetrain and RX600 crankset
- Shimano RX400 hydraulic disc brakes
- 700 x 40c tires specified for paved and unpaved riding
Cons:- Only a 51 cm frame size is listed
- Rigid setup provides no built-in shock absorption
- 2-year limited warranty is specified, with limited coverage detail
Best for: Riders whose fit matches the listed 51 cm frame and who want a carbon gravel bike with clearly named Shimano GRX400 components and hydraulic brakes.
Not ideal for: Riders who need a different frame size, expect built-in suspension, or want a listing with a more extensive warranty description.
- Frame and fork:T800 R21 carbon fiber
- Weight:10.4 kg (22.92 lbs)
- Drivetrain:Shimano GRX400, 20-speed
- Brakes:Shimano RX400 hydraulic disc
- Crankset:Shimano RX600
- Tires:700 x 40c
- Frame size:51 cm
- Warranty:2-year limited
Our verdict“I would choose the GRX400 SAVADECK first when its 51 cm frame fits, because its named drivetrain and brake components make it the clearest race-focused option here.”
SAVADECK SCRB0035 Carbon Gravel Bike with Shimano 22-Speed Drivetrain
The SAVADECK SCRB0035 has the core ingredients many gravel racers seek on paper: a T800 carbon frame and fork, hydraulic disc brakes, and 700x40c tires. It also arrives 90% pre-assembled with a tool kit, a practical advantage over the Tommaso, which explicitly requires professional assembly. For a buyer who wants to reduce setup work, that delivery format is a clear point in its favor, though the remaining assembly still calls for care and a competent safety check.
Its stated 10.4 kg frame-and-fork weight and rigid design resemble the GRX400 SAVADECK’s published weight and overall mixed-surface setup. The main difference is the drivetrain information. The title advertises 22 speeds, while the description identifies Shimano U6000 components and says the speed claims are inconsistent. I would not treat the headline speed count as confirmed. Against the GRX400 model, this uncertainty is why the SCRB0035 takes second place even though both bikes share carbon construction, hydraulic braking, and 40 mm tires.
The SCRB0035 is more appealing than Tommaso if carbon frame and fork construction and included tools are central to the decision. Tommaso offers an aluminum frame with a carbon fork and a lifetime frame warranty, but its supplied details do not identify a comparable tire size or brake system. At the same time, the SCRB0035 does not provide the same clearly named gravel groupset as the GRX400 listing. The fact that both SAVADECK bikes list hydraulic brakes does not resolve the drivetrain question, and neither listing proves a fit advantage without a full sizing chart.
Fit is a notable risk: the product details specify a recommended rider height of 5′7″–5′11″, but only one frame size is described. That range is a starting point rather than a substitute for checking geometry and personal fit. The 2-year warranty is also a shorter stated period than Tommaso’s lifetime frame warranty, and its terms are not fully explained. I would keep this bike in the running if my height falls within the stated range and I can confirm the exact drivetrain and frame size with the seller. If I want transparent component identification, the GRX400 version is the safer choice.
Pros:- T800 carbon frame and fork with stated 10.4 kg weight
- Hydraulic disc brakes and 700x40c tires
- Arrives 90% pre-assembled and includes a tool kit
- Lists a recommended rider-height range
Cons:- Drivetrain speed claims are inconsistent in the supplied description
- Only one frame size is specified
- 2-year warranty details are limited
Best for: Riders in the listed 5′7″–5′11″ height range who prefer a carbon frame and fork, hydraulic brakes, and a bike that arrives mostly assembled with tools.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need a confirmed drivetrain configuration, several size choices, or a warranty description that spells out coverage clearly.
- Frame material:T800 carbon fiber
- Frame and fork weight:10.4 kg (22.92 lbs)
- Drivetrain:Shimano U6000 components; speed claims inconsistent
- Brakes:Hydraulic disc
- Tires:700x40c
- Wheels:29-inch aluminum
- Recommended rider height:5′7″–5′11″
- Assembly and warranty:90% pre-assembled with tools; 2-year warranty
Our verdict“I would choose the SCRB0035 for its carbon construction and mostly assembled delivery only after confirming the drivetrain and fit details.”
Tommaso Sterrata Aluminum Gravel Bike with Carbon Fork and Shimano Drivetrain
The Tommaso Sterrata stands apart from the two SAVADECK bikes by using an aluminum frame with a carbon fork. That gives buyers an alternative to an all-carbon frame-and-fork package without stepping away from a carbon fork. The product description also names Shimano components and a lifetime frame warranty, which is the most distinctive warranty detail in this group. I place it third because the available information does not specify the drivetrain model, gearing, tire width, or brake type needed to judge its race readiness against the SAVADECK options.
For a gravel race, those missing details are not small gaps. A rider needs to know what range of gears is fitted for climbs, whether the brakes suit sustained rough-road descents, and whether the tires match the event surface. The GRX400 SAVADECK names its drivetrain, crankset, brake model, and 40 mm tires; the SCRB0035 at least supplies a 40 mm tire size and hydraulic braking, although its drivetrain claims conflict. Tommaso’s broad reference to Shimano components does not offer the same practical clarity.
The aluminum frame may suit someone who prefers not to select a bike solely for carbon construction, while the carbon fork adds a material difference from a fully aluminum setup. Still, the listing does not provide a weight or geometry, so I would not infer that it is heavier, more durable, or less race-capable than either SAVADECK. Its strongest confirmed practical drawback is that it requires professional assembly. That adds a step before riding and contrasts with the SCRB0035, which arrives mostly assembled with tools included.
There is also a product-information concern: the supplied description contains conflicting model and component details. That makes it especially important to confirm the exact build before ordering. The lifetime frame warranty is a meaningful advantage over the two SAVADECK listings’ stated 2-year coverage, but a warranty period cannot make up for uncertainty about the parts fitted or the frame size. I would consider Tommaso if an aluminum frame, carbon fork, and frame-warranty coverage are my priorities and I can verify the actual bike specification. For a rider trying to choose quickly for a race, the better-documented GRX400 is the more defensible pick.
Pros:- Aluminum frame paired with a carbon fork
- Shimano components are specified, though the exact build is unclear
- Lifetime frame warranty is listed
- Offers a frame-material alternative to the two all-carbon SAVADECK models
Cons:- Professional assembly is required
- The supplied description contains conflicting model and component details
- Drivetrain, brake type, tire size, and frame sizing are not specified
Best for: Riders who prefer an aluminum frame with a carbon fork and value a stated lifetime frame warranty, provided they can verify the exact build and fit.
Not ideal for: Race-focused buyers who need confirmed gearing, brake type, tire width, frame sizing, or a bike that does not require professional assembly.
- Frame:Aluminum
- Fork:Carbon
- Drivetrain:Shimano components; exact specification unclear
- Assembly:Professional assembly required
- Frame warranty:Lifetime
- Tire size:Not specified
- Brake type:Not specified
- Frame size:Not specified
Our verdict“I would consider the Sterrata for its aluminum-frame and warranty combination only after confirming the exact components, sizing, and race-relevant setup.”
How We Picked
I ranked these options for gravel racing, rather than treating every bike described for mixed terrain as an equal race machine. The details supplied for each product are the basis for this guide; I have not filled gaps with assumed geometry, race testing, or unlisted component upgrades. My priority is whether the listing gives a buyer enough reliable information to judge the bike’s fit, drivetrain, braking, and intended surface use.
Drivetrain clarity matters in a race bike because gearing affects both steep climbs and fast sections, while a named groupset lets a buyer understand what is being offered. That puts the SAVADECK GRX400 first: it lists a 20-speed Shimano GRX400 setup, RX400 hydraulic disc brakes, an RX600 crankset, and 40 mm tires. The SCRB0035 also claims a 22-speed Shimano drivetrain, but the supplied description says its speed claims are inconsistent and identifies Shimano U6000 components. I treat that uncertainty as a genuine drawback rather than assuming the more favorable interpretation.
I also weighed frame and fork materials, tires, braking, published sizing, assembly, and warranty details. Carbon construction appears on both SAVADECK bikes, while Tommaso pairs an aluminum frame with a carbon fork. That distinction can guide a buyer’s frame-material preference, but it does not prove which bike is faster or more comfortable: geometry, fit, wheel setup, and component details are not fully provided for every model. The Tommaso’s lifetime frame warranty is a useful point of differentiation, but its listing’s conflicting model and component details limit how confidently I can position it for racing.
Finally, I gave weight to practical purchase risks. A listed frame size or fit range can help a buyer eliminate a poor match before ordering; missing sizing information makes that harder. Assembly demands also affect readiness: Tommaso requires professional assembly, while the SCRB0035 arrives mostly assembled with tools. I rank the products by how clearly they support a race-bike decision, not by unverified claims or an assumption that a carbon frame automatically makes one bike superior.
| gravel race bike | Drivetrain | Brakes |
|---|---|---|
| SAVADECK Carbon Gravel Bike wi | Shimano GRX400, 20-speed | Shimano RX400 hydraulic disc |
| SAVADECK SCRB0035 Carbon Grave | Shimano U6000 components; speed claims inconsistent | Hydraulic disc |
| Tommaso Sterrata Aluminum Grav | Shimano components; exact specification unclear | — |
Factors to Consider When Choosing Best Gravel Race Bikes
For gravel racing, I would compare these bikes by fit and usable specifications before choosing a frame material. A race course can include fast pavement, loose gravel, climbs, and rough descents; the right choice depends on your size, the event’s surface, and confidence in the parts fitted.Start with fit and frame availability
Frame fit comes before a component comparison. The GRX400 SAVADECK lists a single 51 cm frame size, while the SCRB0035 gives a recommended height range of 5′7″–5′11″ but only one size in the supplied information. Tommaso does not list a size here. None of those details is a complete fit chart, so I would check the manufacturer’s geometry, reach, stack, and size availability against my own measurements before buying. A bike that does not fit well is a poor race choice regardless of carbon construction or gearing.
If you are between sizes or outside the listed SCRB0035 height range, treat the available information as a reason to ask questions rather than as a fit guarantee. The 51 cm label on the GRX400 model also does not explain the rider height it suits. I would seek a clear return policy and professional fit guidance when the listing does not show a full size range. This is especially relevant for long gravel events, where an unsuitable riding position can become more troublesome over hours than it may feel during a brief ride.
Read drivetrain claims carefully
Gearing affects how easily you can maintain effort on steep climbs and keep pedaling on faster sections. Here, the GRX400 SAVADECK has the clearest listing: it names a 20-speed Shimano GRX400 drivetrain and an RX600 crankset. The SCRB0035 advertises 22 speeds but also reports inconsistent speed claims while identifying U6000 components. I would ask for confirmation of the exact shifters, derailleurs, cassette, crank, and number of usable gears rather than treating its headline count as settled. Tommaso only identifies Shimano components, which is too general to compare gear range.
More speeds do not automatically mean a bike has more useful gearing for your course. The cassette and chainring combination determine the range and the steps between gears, and those details are not provided for these bikes. If you have a route with long climbs or plan to race on flatter, faster roads, confirm the actual ratios and consider whether they match your cadence and fitness. In this comparison, I give greater weight to a specific, internally consistent specification than to a larger speed claim that needs clarification.
Match tire width and braking to the course
Both SAVADECK listings specify 40 mm tires, a useful width to investigate for mixed pavement and unpaved events. Tire width alone does not tell you the tread pattern, casing, tubeless compatibility, or maximum clearance, so I would check those details before planning a race setup. The Tommaso listing does not provide a tire size, making it harder to know how well its stock setup matches a rough or fast course.
The SAVADECK models also specify hydraulic disc brakes, and the GRX400 bike identifies Shimano RX400 brakes. That component detail gives the GRX400 listing the clearest braking information. The SCRB0035 says hydraulic disc without naming the brake model, while the Tommaso details do not state a brake type. For courses with long descents or changing conditions, ask what pads and rotors are supplied and whether they suit your expected terrain. Do not assume two bikes with hydraulic brakes have identical controls or stopping feel.
Choose frame material without assuming race performance
The two SAVADECK models list T800 carbon frames and forks; Tommaso pairs an aluminum frame with a carbon fork. These descriptions identify construction, but they do not tell you the bikes’ geometry, ride feel, or durability under a particular rider and course. Carbon is not a guarantee of better racing, and aluminum is not automatically a poor choice. Compare fit, build details, warranty terms, and the wheels and tires you will actually race before treating material as the deciding factor.
The stated SAVADECK weight is 10.4 kg for the GRX400 bike and 10.4 kg for the SCRB0035 frame and fork in its listing. Since the descriptions use different labels for the weight figure, I would confirm what is included before making a direct complete-bike comparison. No weight is given for Tommaso, so I would not rank it by weight. A verified fit and coherent build sheet are more useful than guessing from material names alone.
Account for assembly and warranty details
Assembly changes how quickly a bike can be made race-ready. Tommaso requires professional assembly. The SCRB0035 arrives 90% pre-assembled and includes tools, but that does not mean it is ready to ride without checking the remaining setup. The GRX400 listing includes a tool kit but does not give the same assembly percentage. I would budget time for a complete safety inspection and proper adjustment of brakes, shifting, wheels, and cockpit components; if you are not equipped to do that work, ask a bike shop what it will require.
Warranty details also differ: Tommaso lists a lifetime frame warranty, while the two SAVADECK listings specify 2-year coverage, with the GRX400 described as limited. The available descriptions do not provide full terms, exclusions, or a comparison of component coverage. I would read the written warranty before treating one as more protective overall. Frame coverage is valuable, but it does not replace knowing what support is available for assembly questions or replacement parts.
Make the choice around the event you actually ride
For a race on mixed surfaces, first check that the frame fits, then confirm gearing, tires, brakes, and service support. My leading pick, the GRX400 SAVADECK, is the best-supported choice in this group because the provided component list is most specific. I would put the SCRB0035 on the shortlist if its carbon setup and mostly assembled delivery appeal to you, but only after resolving the drivetrain discrepancy. Tommaso is the material-and-warranty alternative, not the safest choice for an immediate race build until its specification and size are confirmed.
Before the event, plan time to check the bike’s assembly and make sure its tires and gearing suit the course. A product listing can identify intended terrain, but it cannot substitute for a confirmed fit or a final mechanical inspection. If you cannot confirm one of those basics, I would keep comparing rather than choosing on a single headline feature.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which of these is the best gravel race bike overall?
I rank the SAVADECK Carbon with Shimano GRX400 first because its drivetrain, crankset, hydraulic brake model, and tire width are specified more clearly than the alternatives. That makes its race-relevant setup easier to assess. Its 51 cm-only listing is a serious limitation, though, so it is not the right overall choice for a rider whose fit does not match that frame.
Is the SCRB0035 really a 22-speed gravel bike?
The title advertises a 22-speed drivetrain, but the supplied description says the speed claims are inconsistent and identifies Shimano U6000 components. I would not treat the 22-speed figure as confirmed without checking the exact parts and configuration with the seller. The GRX400 SAVADECK gives a clearer listed drivetrain specification if component certainty is a priority.
Which bike is best for a rider who prefers an aluminum frame?
The Tommaso Sterrata is the only option here with an aluminum frame, paired with a carbon fork. It also lists a lifetime frame warranty. I would choose it only after verifying its exact components, frame size, tire setup, and braking, since those details are missing or unclear in the product information provided.
Are 40 mm tires suitable for gravel racing?
Both SAVADECK bikes list 40 mm tires and describe use on paved roads and unpaved trails, so that width is a plausible mixed-surface starting point. The best tire depends on the event’s surface, conditions, and clearance; width alone does not describe tread, casing, or tubeless compatibility. I would confirm those details and the bike’s actual tire clearance before planning a race setup.
Can I race one of these bikes as soon as it arrives?
I would not assume any bike is race-ready straight out of its box. Tommaso explicitly requires professional assembly, and the SCRB0035 arrives 90% assembled, which still leaves setup and safety checks. The GRX400 listing does not specify the same assembly percentage. In every case, I would verify the fit and have shifting, brakes, wheels, and cockpit components checked before an event.
Conclusion
My choice for a rider whose fit matches the listed frame is the SAVADECK Carbon with Shimano GRX400. Its named drivetrain and brake components make it the most straightforward race-oriented option to evaluate. If carbon construction and mostly assembled delivery matter more, the SCRB0035 is a reasonable alternative, but I would first get written confirmation of its drivetrain and frame size. For a rider who specifically wants an aluminum frame and values a stated lifetime frame warranty, the Tommaso Sterrata deserves a look after the seller confirms its build and sizing.
I would not buy any of these three on material or speed claims alone. Match the frame to your body, confirm the actual drivetrain and tire setup, and account for assembly before choosing. In this lineup, the GRX400 is my strongest pick for a clearly documented gravel race build; the other two suit narrower preferences and call for more questions first.
NFL season / tailgating Picks
team gear
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
